Best v. Sprouts Farmers Market
Plaintiff: Connie Best
Defendant: Sprouts Farmers Market
Case Number: 6:2023cv02288
Filed: May 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Joseph Dawson
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2023 Filing 13 Joint Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Sprouts Farmers Market.(LaFave, Matthew)
June 30, 2023 Filing 12 Joint Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Sprouts Farmers Market.(LaFave, Matthew)
June 21, 2023 Filing 10 AMENDED CONFERENCE and SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 10/19/2023, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 11/20/2023, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 12/19/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 12/19/2023, Mediation Due by 2/19/2024, Discovery due by 2/19/2024, Motions due by 3/19/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 6/17/2024. Signed by Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 6/21/23. (kmca)
June 16, 2023 Filing 9 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Sprouts Farmers Market, Connie Best.(LaFave, Matthew) Modified on 6/20/2023: to add joint filer as listed (kmca).
June 7, 2023 Filing 8 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Connie Best.(Weaver, Genevieve)
May 30, 2023 Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER Mediation Due by 11/20/2023. Signed by Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 5/26/2023. (abuc)
May 30, 2023 Filing 6 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDERRule 26(f) Conference Deadline 6/16/2023, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 6/30/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 6/30/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 7/21/2023, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 8/21/2023, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 9/20/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 9/20/2023, Discovery due by 11/20/2023, Motions due by 12/20/2023, Jury Selection Deadline 3/19/2024. Signed by Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 5/26/2023. (abuc) (Main Document 6 replaced on 5/31/2023) (abuc, ).
May 26, 2023 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff is directed to file their Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories no later than 6/9/2023. (abuc)
May 26, 2023 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Sprouts Farmers Market. (abuc)
May 26, 2023 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Sprouts Farmers Market.(abuc) (Main Document 3 replaced with corrected document provided by filing user on 5/26/2023) (abuc).
May 26, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Greenville County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-23-01762. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11123817), filed by Sprouts Farmers Market. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(abuc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Best v. Sprouts Farmers Market
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Connie Best
Represented By: David W Hartman
Represented By: Genevieve Mendes Weaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sprouts Farmers Market
Represented By: Matthew Clark LaFave
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?