Best v. Sprouts Farmers Market
Connie Best |
Sprouts Farmers Market |
6:2023cv02288 |
May 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Joseph Dawson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Joint Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Sprouts Farmers Market.(LaFave, Matthew) |
Filing 12 Joint Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Sprouts Farmers Market.(LaFave, Matthew) |
Filing 10 AMENDED CONFERENCE and SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 10/19/2023, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 11/20/2023, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 12/19/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 12/19/2023, Mediation Due by 2/19/2024, Discovery due by 2/19/2024, Motions due by 3/19/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 6/17/2024. Signed by Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 6/21/23. (kmca) |
Filing 9 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Sprouts Farmers Market, Connie Best.(LaFave, Matthew) Modified on 6/20/2023: to add joint filer as listed (kmca). |
Filing 8 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Connie Best.(Weaver, Genevieve) |
Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER Mediation Due by 11/20/2023. Signed by Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 5/26/2023. (abuc) |
Filing 6 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDERRule 26(f) Conference Deadline 6/16/2023, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 6/30/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 6/30/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 7/21/2023, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 8/21/2023, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 9/20/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 9/20/2023, Discovery due by 11/20/2023, Motions due by 12/20/2023, Jury Selection Deadline 3/19/2024. Signed by Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 5/26/2023. (abuc) (Main Document 6 replaced on 5/31/2023) (abuc, ). |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff is directed to file their Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories no later than 6/9/2023. (abuc) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Sprouts Farmers Market. (abuc) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Sprouts Farmers Market.(abuc) (Main Document 3 replaced with corrected document provided by filing user on 5/26/2023) (abuc). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Greenville County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-23-01762. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11123817), filed by Sprouts Farmers Market. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(abuc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Best v. Sprouts Farmers Market | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Connie Best | |
Represented By: | David W Hartman |
Represented By: | Genevieve Mendes Weaver |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sprouts Farmers Market | |
Represented By: | Matthew Clark LaFave |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.