Mota v. Harms
| Juan D Mota |
| Gary W Harris and Gary W Harms, Jr |
| 6:2023cv02812 |
| June 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph Dawson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION to Stay by Gary W Harms, Jr. Response to Motion due by 8/16/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Bach, Adam) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Crittenden Bach on behalf of Gary W Harms, Jr (Bach, Adam) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Juan D Mota. (Brogdon, Beau) Modified to edit text on 6/30/2023 (abuc). |
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Juan D Mota.(pbri, ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Gary W Harms, Jr.. (pbri, ) (Main Document 3 replaced with issued summons 6/21/2023 and corrected name of defendant) (pbri, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gary W Harms, Jr. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11163986.), filed by Juan D Mota. Service due by 9/18/2023 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Juan D Mota, #2 Exhibit A Quitclaim Deed)(pbri, ) (Main Document 2 replaced on 6/21/2023 to correct entry and name of defendant) (pbri, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
