Burlington Insurance Company, The v. Five Nine Protection Services LLC et al
Burlington Insurance Company, The |
Five Nine Protection Services LLC and Kyler B Vitko |
6:2023cv03042 |
June 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Joseph Dawson |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Burlington Insurance Company, The. Kyler B Vitko served on 8/12/2023, answer due 9/5/2023. (Harris, David) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE by Burlington Insurance Company, The. Five Nine Protection Services LLC waiver executed on 6/29/2023, answer due 8/28/2023. (Harris, David) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Five Nine Protection Services LLC, Kyler B Vitko. (Attachments: #1 Summons Kyler B Vitko)(kmca) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Burlington Insurance Company, The.(kmca) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT against Five Nine Protection Services LLC, Kyler B Vitko (Filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-11177813), filed by Burlington Insurance Company, The. Service due by 9/25/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Underlying Complaint in Greenville County, 2023-CP-23-00594, #2 Exhibit 2 Policy No. 740BG01528-02, (redacted))(kmca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.