Latimer v. Internal Revenue Service
| Sergio Donte Latimer |
| Internal Revenue Service |
| 6:2023cv05259 |
| October 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: 10 Transfer of Case Management, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Sergio Donte Latimer, #227614, Greenville County Detention Center, 20 McGee Street, Greenville, SC, 29601 (dsto, ) |
| Filing 10 ***CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED to civil case manager for Judge Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.. Any future filings must be sent to the Clerk's Office at the following address: US District Court, Clerk of Court, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, SC, 29201 (dsto, ) |
| Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF, 6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #5 Order - 1983 - No Service w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Sergio Donte Latimer, #227614, Greenville County Detention Center, 20 McGee Street, Greenville, SC, 29601 (dsto, ) |
| Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that this action be summarily dismissed with prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 11/8/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 10/10/2023. (dsto, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis per #5 No Serve Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 10/25/2023.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 10/25/2023. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Sergio Donte Latimer. Response to Motion due by 11/3/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Internal Revenue Service, filed by Sergio Donte Latimer. Service due by 1/18/2024. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Latimer v. Internal Revenue Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sergio Donte Latimer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Internal Revenue Service | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
