Hannigan et al v. Rice et al
| Christopher Hannigan and Brittany Hannigan |
| Andrew Rice and School District of Greenville County, The |
| 6:2023cv05529 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Donald C Coggins |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint by Andrew Rice. (White, Walter) |
| Filing 17 TEXT ORDER granting #16 motion for leave to file amended answer. Defendant Andrew Rice is directed to file the amended answer within 5 days Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 12/21/23.(alew) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Amend/Correct #9 Answer to Complaint by Andrew Rice. Response to Motion due by 1/3/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 EXHIBIT A - Answer of Andrew Rice (First Amended)). Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(White, Walter) Modified on 12/21/2023 to remove duplicate text (alew). |
Filing 15
ORDER AND NOTICE SETTING Pretrial Telephone Conference. Conference set for Thursday, January 4, 2024 at 1:30 PM before Honorable Donald C Coggins Jr. Defendant School District of Greenville County's counsel is directed to arrange and initiate the conference call, conference in all other participating counsel, and then connect to chambers at 864-591-5340. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 11/29/23. (alew)
|
| Filing 14 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 12/19/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 2/12/2024, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 3/8/2024, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 4/8/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 4/29/2024, Discovery due by 5/27/2024, Motions due by 6/10/2024, Mediation Due by 6/24/2024, Motion in Limine due by 7/26/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 8/5/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 8/26/2024. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 11/29/23. (alew) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint by School District of Greenville County, The.(Bach, Adam) |
| Filing 12 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Brittany Hannigan, Christopher Hannigan (Appleby, Mitchell) Modified on 11/17/2023 to add party as filer per counsel (alew). |
| Filing 11 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 7 Reason: attorney refiled to make correction. Corrected Filing Document Number #8 . (alew) |
| Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Andrew Rice.(White, Walter) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Andrew Rice.(White, Walter) |
| Filing 8 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER School District of Greenville County, The answer due 11/28/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - correspondence)(Bach, Adam) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiffs' Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are due 14 days after removal. (alew) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by School District of Greenville County, The.(alew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Greenville County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-23-05019. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11403878), filed by Andrew Rice, School District of Greenville County, The. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Documents)(alew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
