LaCaze v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
| John LaCase and John LaCaze |
| Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company |
| 6:2024cv00191 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| Joseph Dawson |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE by John LaCaze. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company waiver executed on 2/27/2024, answer due 4/29/2024. (Attachments: #1 Waiver of Service - Signed)(Louzri, Melissa) (Main Document 7 AND Attachment 1 replaced on 2/29/2024 to correct case number) (jtho, ). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF CASE NUMBER: The new case number is 6:24-cv-00191-JDA. Please make a note of this for all future filings as well as Judge Austin's filing preferences. (jens) |
| Filing 5 Case Reassigned to Judge Jacquelyn D Austin. Judge Joseph Dawson, III no longer assigned to the case. (suro, ) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. Service due by 4/11/2024. (hcic, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by John LaCaze.(hcic, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (filing fee $405 receipt number ASCDC-11524361), filed by John LaCaze. (hcic, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
