Barber v. Waynick et al
Flavil Barber, III |
Alivia S Waynick, Scotty Bodiford and Lauren Davis Price |
6:2024cv05112 |
September 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Donald C Coggins |
Bristow Marchant |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Greenville. (rweb, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Flavil Barber, III. NOT signed by Flavil Barber, III but by Joshua Robinson. Response to Motion due by 9/30/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(rweb, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Flavil Barber, III. Response to Motion due by 9/30/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(rweb, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Scotty Bodiford, Lauren Davis Price, Alivia S Waynick, filed by Flavil Barber, III. Service due by 12/16/2024. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(rweb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.