Barber v. Waynick et al
| Flavil Barber, III |
| Alivia S Waynick, Scotty Bodiford and Lauren Davis Price |
| 6:2024cv05112 |
| September 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| William S Brown |
| Donald C Coggins |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Addressee: Flavil Barber, III. Document Returned: #15 Proper Form Order,, 14 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, 13 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #12 Proper Form Order. (rweb, ) |
| Filing 16 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #15 Order Regarding Amendment, 14 Text Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, 13 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #12 Proper Form Order and blank amended complaint form placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Flavil Barber, III, #0326, GCDC, 20 McGee St, Greenville, SC 29601. (rweb, ) |
Filing 15
ORDER REGARDING AMENDMENT. Plaintiff's Complaint is subject to summary dismissal. Plaintiff may be able to cure the deficiencies of his Complaint by filing an amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint that corrects the deficiencies this action will be recommended for summary dismissal. Case to be brought into proper form by 11/13/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge William S. Brown on 10/23/24. (rweb, )
|
|
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel Signed by Magistrate Judge William S. Brown on 10/23/24.(rweb, )
|
|
Filing 13
TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Magistrate Judge William S. Brown on 10/23/24.(rweb, )
|
|
Filing 12
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 11/13/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge William S. Brown on 10/23/24. (rweb, )
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF CASE NUMBER, 6:24-cv-05112-DCC-WSB. Send all future filings to Clerk of Court, 250 East North St, Greenville, SC 29601. (rweb, ) |
| Filing 7 Case Reassigned to Judge Magistrate Judge William Stevens Brown. Judge Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant no longer assigned to the case. Motions referred to William Stevens Brown.(cwil, ) |
| Filing 5 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Greenville. (rweb, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Flavil Barber, III. NOT signed by Flavil Barber, III but by Joshua Robinson. Response to Motion due by 9/30/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(rweb, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Flavil Barber, III. Response to Motion due by 9/30/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Bristow Marchant.(rweb, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Scotty Bodiford, Lauren Davis Price, Alivia S Waynick, filed by Flavil Barber, III. Service due by 12/16/2024. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(rweb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
