Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: Cincinnati Insurance Company
Case Number: 7:2008cv03631
Filed: October 29, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Insurance Office
County: Spartanburg
Presiding Judge: Henry M Herlong
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER granting Cincinnati's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot Pharmacists Mutual's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 10/1/09.(awil)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company
Represented By: James Dunbar Myrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cincinnati Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?