Tinsley v. Wight et al
| James Douglas Tinsley |
| Brian Wight, R Bogan, Chuck Wright and County Of Spartanburg |
| 7:2009cv02455 |
| September 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Spartanburg Office |
| Spartanburg |
| Sol Blatt |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 60 : The Court grants in part and denies in part the Defendants' 35 Motion for Summary Judgment and denies Plaintiff's 40 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court grants in part the Plaintiff's 52 Motion to Stay and request for depositions, denying the motion with respect to Plaintiff's request for depositions. This action is stayed until the conclusion of the Plaintiff's state criminal prosecution. Signed by Honorable Sol Blatt, Jr on March 31, 2011. (ncha, )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 , the Plaintiff's objections 11 are sustained; the Plaintiff's motion to amend 14 is granted; and this matter is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.Signed by Honorable Sol Blatt, Jr on 2/4/2010. (mbro, )
|
|
Filing
9
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the District Court dismiss the 1 Complaint filed by James Douglas Tinsley, in this case without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 10/19/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks on 9/30/09. (kmca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
