Vincent v. Piedmont Community Actions Inc

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit South Carolina District Court Vincent v. Piedmont Community Actions Inc

Vincent v. Piedmont Community Actions Inc

Plaintiff:	Sheila Vincent
Defendant:	Piedmont Community Actions Inc
Case Number:	7:2013cv01135
Filed:	April 26, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Spartanburg Office
County:	Spartanburg
Presiding Judge:	Timothy M Cain
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 17, 2013	Filing 19 ORDER that Defendant shall respond in full to all Plaintiff's discovery before December 20th; Plaintiff's entitlement to attorneys fees is held in abeyance until further order of this Court; If the Defendant intends to respond to the Requests for Admission issued by Plaintiff, Defendant shall submit its response to Plaintiff by December 20th. Provided, however, this Order shall be without prejudice to the right of the Plaintiff to move for an Order of the Court providing that any matter for which no such response was received by Plaintiffprior to November 31st be deemed admitted for purposes of this litigation. The scheduling Order shall be modified as outlined and in the revised scheduling order submitted by the parties.s/Timothy M. CainTimothy M. CainUnited States District JudgeAnderson, South Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 12/17/2013. (gpre, )

Date Filed

Document Text

December 17, 2013

Filing 19 ORDER that Defendant shall respond in full to all Plaintiff's discovery before December 20th; Plaintiff's entitlement to attorneys fees is held in abeyance until further order of this Court; If the Defendant intends to respond to the Requests for Admission issued by Plaintiff, Defendant shall submit its response to Plaintiff by December 20th. Provided, however, this Order shall be without prejudice to the right of the Plaintiff to move for an Order of the Court providing that any matter for which no such response was received by Plaintiffprior to November 31st be deemed admitted for purposes of this litigation. The scheduling Order shall be modified as outlined and in the revised scheduling order submitted by the parties.s/Timothy M. CainTimothy M. CainUnited States District JudgeAnderson, South Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 12/17/2013. (gpre, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vincent v. Piedmont Community Actions Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheila Vincent
Represented By:	Timothy Ryan Langley
Represented By:	Charles Joseph Hodge
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Piedmont Community Actions Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?