Cantrell et al v. New Penn Financial LLC et al
| Kevin Cantrell and AnnaMarie Cantrell |
| New Penn Financial LLC, Avenue 365 Lender Services, Jake Brown and Shell Point |
| 7:2017cv01078 |
| April 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Spartanburg Office |
| Spartanburg |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 55 Motion for Summary Judgment as set out. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 9/26/2019.(abuc)
|
|
Filing
47
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as set out. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 9/17/2018.(abuc)
|
|
Filing
20
OPINION AND ORDER re 4 Motion to Dismiss. It is the judgment of the CourtDefendants motion to dismiss is DENIED IN PART, GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART with leave to refile, and Plaintiffs are GRANTED leave to file an amended complaint within seven days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 6/20/2017.(abuc)
|
|
Filing
19
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER granting 18 Motion for Confidentiality Order Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 6/7/2017.(abuc) (Main Document 19 replaced on 6/7/2017) (abuc, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
