Bowers v. Bowers
Plaintiff: Christopher J Bowers
Defendant: Kimberly A Bowers
Case Number: 7:2018cv01835
Filed: July 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Spartanburg Office
County: Spartanburg
Presiding Judge: Donald C Coggins
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 2701
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2018 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kimberly A Bowers. (abuc)
July 5, 2018 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Christopher J Bowers.(abuc)
July 5, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kimberly A Bowers (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-7870102.), filed by Christopher J Bowers. Service due by 10/3/2018(abuc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bowers v. Bowers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kimberly A Bowers
Represented By: Hannah Rogers Metcalfe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher J Bowers
Represented By: D Alan Lazenby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?