McDaniels v. Wright et al
| Kevin Wayne McDaniels |
| Chuck Wright, Robert Hall, Tim Tucker, Barry Joe Barnette and Phil Easler |
| 7:2018cv02796 |
| October 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Terry L Wooten |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 OBJECTION to #11 Report and Recommendation by Kevin Wayne McDaniels. Reply to Objections due by 11/26/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Envelope) (lbak) |
| Filing 12 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #10 Order - 1983 - No Service and #11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION placed in U.S. Mail to Kevin Wayne McDaniels (bgoo) |
| Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending the court dismiss the complaint without issuance and service of process. If the court accepts this recommendation, Plaintiff's #4 motion for preliminary injunction and #5 motion for certificate of innocence will be rendered moot. Objections to R&R due by 11/13/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 10/29/2018. (bgoo) Modified on 10/29/2018 to edit text. (bgoo) |
Filing 10
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350. Motion granted: #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Motion denied: #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 10/29/2018. (bgoo)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for a Certificate of Innocence by Kevin Wayne McDaniels. Response to Motion due by 10/30/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Mailing, #2 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Kevin Wayne McDaniels. Response to Motion due by 10/30/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Mailing, #2 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges.(lbak) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Kevin Wayne McDaniels. Response to Motion due by 10/30/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Mailing, #2 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Kevin Wayne McDaniels. Response to Motion due by 10/30/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Proof of Mailing, #4 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (Additional attachments added on 10/24/2018 #5 Financial Certificate, #6 Cover Letter, #7 Envelope) (lbak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kevin Wayne McDaniels. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Proof of Mailing, #4 Envelope) (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
