Sallis v. State of South Carolina Child Support Division
| Derrick Sallis |
| State of South Carolina Child Support Division |
| 7:2019cv00320 |
| February 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 OBJECTION to #9 Report and Recommendation by Derrick Sallis. (Attachments: #1 Judicial Notice Request)(kmca) |
| Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 11 Transfer of Case Management placed in U.S. Mail to Derrick Sallis (gpre, ) |
| Filing 11 ***CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED to civil case manager for Judge Timothy M. Cain. Any future filings must be sent to the Clerk's Office at the following address: 300 East Washington Street, Greenville, SC 29601. (gpre, ) |
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, #8 Order, Court's Copy Policy, placed in U.S. Mail to Derrick Sallis (gpre, ) |
| Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION it is recommended that the District Court dismiss this action without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 2/20/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 2/6/2019. (gpre, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 2/6/2019. (gpre, )
|
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 2/6/2019.(gpre, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Derrick Sallis. Response to Motion due by 2/19/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(gpre, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of South Carolina Child Support Division, filed by Derrick Sallis. Service due by 5/6/2019 (Attachments: #1 Constitution of the United States, #2 Judicial Notice Request, #3 Exhibit 1 - Title 1-General Provisions, #4 Exhibit 2- Federal Rules of Evidence, #5 Exhibit 3 - Public Law 93-595, #6 Exhibit 4 - Rule 5.1)(gpre, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sallis v. State of South Carolina Child Support Division | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Derrick Sallis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of South Carolina Child Support Division | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
