Robertson v. Big Lots Stores Inc
Barbara A Robertson |
Big Lots Stores Inc |
7:2019cv02555 |
September 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 CONSENT AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 12/30/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 3/20/2020, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 5/1/2020, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 4/17/2020, Discovery due by 6/26/2020, Motions due by 7/17/2020, Jury Selection Deadline 10/5/2020, Mediation Due by 6/26/2020. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 10/23/19. (alew, ) |
Filing 13 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Big Lots Stores Inc.(Daniels, Christopher) |
Filing 12 Joint Responses to LR 26.03 Interrogatories and Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Big Lots Stores Inc.(Daniels, Christopher) |
Filing 11 MEDIATION ORDER: Mediation Due by 3/23/2020. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 9/26/19. (alew, ) |
Filing 10 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 10/17/2019, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 10/31/2019, Rule 26 Report due by 10/31/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 11/21/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 12/23/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 1/22/2020, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 1/22/2020, Discovery due by 3/23/2020, Motions due by 4/22/2020, Jury Selection Deadline 7/21/2020, Mediation Due by 3/23/2020. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 9/26/19. (alew, ) |
Filing 9 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Barbara A Robertson.(Whitehead, John) |
Filing 6 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Spartanburg County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Acknowledgement of Receipt of Filed Copy of Notice of Removal)(Daniels, Christopher) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Big Lots Stores Inc.(Daniels, Christopher) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Big Lots Stores Inc.(alew, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Spartanburg County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2019-CP-42-01770. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8661449), filed by Big Lots Stores Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B-Email Communication with Plaintiff's Counsel)(alew, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Robertson v. Big Lots Stores Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Big Lots Stores Inc | |
Represented By: | Christopher James Daniels |
Represented By: | Erin Richardson Stuckey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Barbara A Robertson | |
Represented By: | Nihar Manhar Patel |
Represented By: | John Matthew Whitehead |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.