Bouchillon v. Carson et al
Anne Graham Bouchillon |
Michael Carson and Isothermal Textile Services LLC |
7:2021cv00865 |
March 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Timothy M Cain |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CONSENT AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 6/28/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 7/28/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 9/27/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 9/27/2021, Discovery due by 10/27/2021, Mediation Due by 11/3/2021, Motions due by 11/12/2021, Jury Selection Deadline 1/12/2022 or sixty (60) days after dispositive motions have been resolved. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 5/17/21. (kmca) |
Filing 14 Joint ADR STATEMENT/CERTIFICATION by Michael Carson, Isothermal Textile Services LLC, Anne Graham Bouchillon (Jones, Brandon) Modified on 5/13/2021: to add joint filer as listed (kmca). |
Filing 13 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Michael Carson, Isothermal Textile Services LLC, Anne Graham Bouchillon. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Consent Amended Conference and Scheduling Order, #2 Joint Answers to Local Rule 26.03 Interrogatories, #3 Exhibit Joint Rule 26(a)(1) Stipulation)(Jones, Brandon) Modified on 5/13/2021: to add joint filer as listed; to remove duplicate text (kmca). |
Filing 12 MEDIATION ORDER. Mediation Due by 10/4/2021. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 4/13/21. (kmca) |
Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER. Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 5/3/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 5/17/2021, ADR Statement due by 5/17/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 5/17/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 6/28/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 7/28/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 8/27/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 8/27/2021, Discovery due by 9/27/2021, Motions due by 10/12/2021, Jury Selection Deadline 12/13/2021 or sixty (60) days after dispositive motions have been resolved. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 4/13/21. (kmca) |
Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Anne Graham Bouchillon.(Maxey, William) |
Filing 9 REPLY by Isothermal Textile Services LLC to 8 Order. (kmca) Re-filed by clerk to correct event.(kmca) |
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER: Jurisdiction in this matter is predicated upon diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332. Within ten (10) days of the date of this order, Defendant Isothermal Textile Services LLC is to inform the court of the citizenship of all members for the purpose of determining whether the requirements of federal subject matter jurisdiction are satisfied. See 28 U.S.C. 1332; Gen. Tech. Applications, Inc. v. Exro Ltda, 388 F. 3d 114, 121 (4th Cir. 2004) (holding that "[a limited liability company] is an unincorporated association, akin to a partnership for diversity purposes, whose citizenship is that of its members."). Entered at the direction of the Honorable Timothy M Cain on 4/2/21. (kmca) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Michael Carson, Isothermal Textile Services LLC.(Jones, Brandon) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Michael Carson, Isothermal Textile Services LLC.(kmca) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Spartanburg County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-42-00486. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0420-9730913), filed by Isothermal Textile Services LLC, Michael Carson. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(kmca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.