Barrett v. BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC
| Alan Barrett |
| BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC |
| 7:2021cv03773 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Alan Barrett.(Summerlin, Jeremy) |
| Filing 13 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC.(McCoy, Ellison) |
| Filing 12 Joint Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC.(McCoy, Ellison) |
| Filing 11 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC.(McCoy, Ellison) |
Filing 10
CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 12/21/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 1/4/2022, Rule 26 Report due by 1/4/2022, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 1/25/2022, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 2/24/2022, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 3/28/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 3/28/2022, Discovery due by 5/27/2022, Motions due by 7/26/2022, Mediation Due by 6/27/2022, This case is subject to being called for jury selection and trial thirty (30) days following the issuance of a Report and Recommendation on any motion described in paragraph 9 of this Order, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 11/30/2021. (sgri, )
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC. (McCoy, Ellison) |
| Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Alan Barrett.(Summerlin, Jeremy) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Spartanburg County. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents Confirmation of Receipt by Spartanburg County Clerk of Court)(McCoy, Ellison) |
| Filing 4 PLAINTIFF HAS 14-DAYS TO FILE 26.01 INTERROGATORIES DUE 12/2/2021. (sgri) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC. (sgri) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas of Spartanburg County, South Carolina, case number 2021-CP-42-03577. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC- 10193648), filed by BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: State Court Documents) (sgri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barrett v. BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alan Barrett | |
| Represented By: | Jeremy Randall Summerlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ellison Ford McCoy |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Brendan Kelley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
