Lopez v. Novatec Inc
Plaintiff: Taury Daniel Lopez and Mando Sandoval
Defendant: Novatec Inc
Case Number: 7:2022cv04576
Filed: December 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Henry M Herlong
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2023 Filing 11 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 3/2/2023, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 3/17/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 3/17/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/11/2023, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/11/2023, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/12/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 6/12/2023, Discovery due by 7/12/2023, Motions due by 7/26/2023, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 9/8/2023, Motion in Limine due by 9/26/2023, Pretrial Briefs due by 10/3/2023, Jury Selection Deadline 10/10/2023. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 2/10/23. (arut)
February 10, 2023 Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Novatec Inc.(Culbreath, Gray)
February 10, 2023 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Novatec Inc.(Culbreath, Gray)
January 19, 2023 Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Answer of Novatec, Inc. due 2/10/2023. Entered at the direction of Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 1/19/23.(arut) Modified on 1/20/2023 to add docket text "TEXT" (arut).
January 19, 2023 Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Novatec Inc. Response to Motion due by 2/2/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Culbreath, Gray)
January 4, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Taury Daniel Lopez. Novatec Inc served on 12/30/2022, answer due 1/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Form 3811)(Ellis, Todd)
December 20, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Novatec Inc. (arut)
December 19, 2022 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Taury Daniel Lopez.(arut)
December 19, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Novatec Inc ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10855739.), filed by Taury Daniel Lopez. Service due by 3/20/2023.(arut)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lopez v. Novatec Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Taury Daniel Lopez
Represented By: Todd R Ellis
Represented By: Wes A Kissinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mando Sandoval
Represented By: Todd R Ellis
Represented By: Wes A Kissinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Novatec Inc
Represented By: Gray Thomas Culbreath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?