Wright v. Wright et al
Plaintiff: Douglas Alexander Wright
Defendant: Sheriff Chuck Wright, Judge Cole and Spencer Smith
Case Number: 7:2023cv02178
Filed: May 22, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Referring Judge: Mary Geiger Lewis
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2023 Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Order - 1983 - No Service,, Terminate Motions, #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Douglas Alexander Wright placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to Douglas Alexander Wright 402198 Spartanburg County Detention Center 950 California Avenue Spartanburg, SC 29306. (dgar)
June 28, 2023 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Douglas Alexander Wright. The undersigned therefore RECOMMENDS that the Court decline to give Plaintiff leave to amend his Complaint and DISMISS this action against Defendants without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. IT IS SO RECOMMENDED. Objections to R&R due by 7/12/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 06/28/2023. (apsn)
June 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350.00, Motion granted: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by Douglas Alexander Wright. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 06/28/2023. (apsn)
May 22, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Douglas Alexander Wright. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar)
May 22, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cole, Spencer Smith, Chuck Wright, filed by Douglas Alexander Wright. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dgar)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Wright et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas Alexander Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheriff Chuck Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge Cole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spencer Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?