Sanchez v. Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of CA, LLC
| Juan Sanchez |
| Advance America Cash Advance Centers of California LLC |
| 7:2023cv05634 |
| November 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Donald C Coggins |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Addressee: Patrick N. Keegan. Document Returned: 12 Clerk Staff Notes re: Letter of Case Transfer (alew) |
| Filing 9 Case transferred in from District of California Eastern; Case Number 2:23-cv-01991. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 8
ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/3/2023 GRANTING The parties' Stipulated Request to transfer this Action to U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina. The court TRANSFERS this action to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina; The court further orders the Clerk of the Court for the Eastern District of California in Sacramento, to forward all filings in this action to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina; and The Clerk of the Court for the Eastern District of California shall close this case upon completion of the transfer. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L) [Transferred from California Eastern on 11/6/2023.]
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Transfer of Venue to United States District for the District of South Carolina by Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of California, LLC. Attorney Shively, Ashley L. added. (Shively, Ashley) [Transferred from California Eastern on 11/6/2023.] |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Khoury, Rosemary) [Transferred from California Eastern on 11/6/2023.] |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Juan Sanchez re #3 Civil New Case Documents for DAD. (Khoury, Rosemary) [Transferred from California Eastern on 11/6/2023.] |
| Filing 4 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of California, LLC on 9/19/2023, Answer due 11/20/2023 (Keegan, Patrick) [Transferred from California Eastern on 11/6/2023.] |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/23/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Reader, L) [Transferred from California Eastern on 11/6/2023.] |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of California, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Isam C. Khoury* *Cohelan Khoury & Singer* *605 C Street, Suite 200* *San Diego, California 92101*. (Reader, L) [Transferred from California Eastern on 11/6/2023.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of California, LLC by Juan Sanchez. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11075749) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Khoury, Isam) [Transferred from California Eastern on 11/6/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
