Flanigan v. United States et al
| Michael Brunell Flanigan |
| United States, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Rex Blocker, Richard Kelso, John LaManna, Harley G Lappin and Hector Lopez |
| 8:2008cv00941 |
| March 26, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Prison:Prison Condition Office |
| Edgefield |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 15 Report and Recommendations, that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 9/25/09. (kmca)
|
|
Filing
15
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the District Court dismiss the complaint in the above-captioned case without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 9/11/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks on 8/24/09. (kmca)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that in light of the standard set forth in Wallace, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the 7 Report and Recommendations, and the Plaintiff's Objections, and orders REMAND to the Magistrate for further determination. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 7/24/09. (kmca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
