Paddock v. Nash
Plaintiff: Stephen Charles Paddock
Defendant: Ray Nash
Case Number: 8:2008cv01705
Filed: April 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Prison:Prison Condition Office
County: Dorchester
Presiding Judge: Henry F. Floyd
Presiding Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 18 Report and Recommendations, that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the Court's orders. Signed by Honorable Henry F. Floyd on 10/21/08. (kmca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paddock v. Nash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Charles Paddock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ray Nash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?