Cleveland v. Seneca SC, City of et al
George Cleveland |
Seneca SC, City of, Bonnie L Moses, Rick Lacey, Terry F Mullikin, Ronnie O'Kelly, Seneca Police Department, John Covington and John Does |
8:2009cv00626 |
March 12, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Oconee |
William M Catoe |
Henry M Herlong |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 OPINION and ORDER denying 73 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 4/26/10.(sfla) |
Filing 74 OPINION and ORDER denying 72 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 4/8/10.(sfla) |
Filing 69 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTING 65 Report and Recommendations, DENYING 61 Motion for TRO, filed by George Cleveland, GRANTING 48 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Bonnie L Moses, John Covington, Rick Lacey, Ronnie O'Kelly, Seneca Police Department, Terry F Mullikin, Seneca SC, City of, John Does. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 3/23/10. (sfla) |
Filing 52 ORDER denying 46 Motion for Reconsideration re 44 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 11/2/09.(jtho, ) |
Filing 44 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 39 Report and Recommendations, and denying 36 Motion for Default Judgment filed by George Cleveland. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 10/15/2009. (sjam, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.