Alston v. Winthrop University Police Department et al
| Kendrick V Alston |
| Winthrop University Police Department and Rock Hill City Police Department |
| 8:2009cv01130 |
| April 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Anderson/Greenwood Office |
| York |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr (Other) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER denying 99 Motion for Reconsideration filed by Kendrick V Alston; Order signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on January 26, 2011.(ncha, )
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 79 , GRANTING 68 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Dewayne Bunch, Winthrop University Police Department, GRANTING 69 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Rock Hill City Police Department, John Ranier, Mike Smothers, AND DENYING AS MOOT plaintiff's 95 Motion. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on January 14, 2011. (ncha, )
|
|
Filing
79
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : It is recommended that the 68 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Dewayne Bunch, Winthrop University Police Department, 69 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Rock Hill City Police Department, John Ranier, Mike Smothers be GRANTED and the Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 12/6/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks on November 17, 2010. (Attachment: # 1 objection notice)(ncha, )
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER denying without prejudice 30 , 31 Motions for Summary Judgment; Plaintiff is hereby ordered to immediately serve and file another copy of the new additional evidence. Within ten days of service of this new additional evidence, Defendants ma y re-file any motions for summary judgment. This matter is recommitted back to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial handling and also consideration of the additional evidence if Defendants re-file their motions for summary judgment. The Defendants' Joint Objection to Additional Submissions and, Alternatively, Request for Extension 55 is therefore MOOT. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on July 9, 2010.(ncha, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
