Duncan v. Cook et al
Jimmy Duncan |
Robert Cook, Chuck Fraser, Harris Beach, David Mathews, B Ray Woodard, Sean Thorton, T K Alexandra and Jay Lemacks |
8:2009cv01186 |
May 7, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Anderson/Greenwood Office |
Colleton |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
Margaret B Seymour |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 ORDER ADOPTING 9 , 35 , and 42 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Defendants Fraser, Beach, Mathews, Woodard, Thorton, and Alexandra are summarily dismissed. To the extent Plaintiff seeks to enjoin his state court proceedings, hi s request for injunctive relief is DENIED. Plaintiff's 13 motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED. Plaintiff's 41 motion for default judgment as to Defendant Lemacks is DENIED. The case is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial handling. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 9/9/09. (kmca) |
Filing 42 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that plaintiff's 41 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Jay Lemarks, filed by Jimmy Duncan, be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 8/17/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks on 7/30/09. (kmca) |
Filing 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that plaintiff's 13 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for complete separation (transfer to another facility) be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 8/7/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks on 7/21/09. (kmca) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.