Roberson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
| Tyrone Lamar Roberson |
| South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jon E Ozmint and Office of General Counsel |
| 8:2009cv01333 |
| May 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Anderson/Greenwood Office |
| Lee |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 60 Motion for Transcript at Government Expense signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 5/11/2010.(ncha, ) Modified on 5/11/2010 to edit text (ncha, ).
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 36 , GRANTING 20 Motion for Summary Judgment, and denying as moot 29 Motion to Amend/Correct, 27 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and 24 Motion for Declaratory Judgment. Order signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 2/24/2010. (ncha, )
|
|
Filing
36
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; It is recommended that 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by South Carolina Department of Corrections be granted and the Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed with prejudice; It is further recommended that 29 MOTION to Amend/Correct, 27 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, and 24 MOTION for Declaratory Judgment be denied as moot; Objections to R&R due by 2/16/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks on 1/27/10. (ncha, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
