Hart v. Rainier et al
| Marshall Leon Hart |
| J Rainier, M Del Castillo and Officer Caldwell |
| 8:2009cv01688 |
| June 26, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Anderson/Greenwood Office |
| York |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 38 , GRANTING 32 Motion for Summary Judgment, 23 Motion for Summary Judgment; Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 6/1/2010. (ncha, )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 12 Report and Recommendations, that the Complaint is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process as to defendants York County Detention Center and Rock Hill Police Department only. Process shall issue for the remaining defendants. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 9/3/09. (kmca)
|
|
Filing
12
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for Partial Summary Dismissal as to Defendants York County Detention Center and Rock Hill Police Department without prejudice and without issuance and service of process for these Defendants. Process shall issue for service of the remaining Defendants. Objections to R&R due by 8/17/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks on 7/30/09. (kmca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
