Folkes v. Byrd et al
Leroy Folkes |
Wade Byrd, Sgt Wright, Ms Carwile, Ms Jackson, Capt Wade, Ofc McKnight and Sgt Springer |
8:2010cv00022 |
January 7, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Anderson/Greenwood Office |
Anderson |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
Henry M Herlong |
Prison:Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 55 , GRANTING 46 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Ms Carwile, Sgt Wright, Sgt Springer, Ofc McKnight, Wade Byrd, Capt Wade, Ms Jackson. It is ORDERED that Folkes' excessive force, medi cal indifference, and conspiracy claims are dismissed with prejudice, and that Folkes' state law claims and inadequate mental healthtreatment claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on November 15, 2010. (ncha, ) |
Filing 55 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the Defendants' 46 MOTION for Summary Judgment be granted and the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 11/8/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks on October 21, 2010. (Attachment: # 1 objection notice)(ncha, ) |
Filing 50 OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 38 , DENYING 37 Motion for Default Judgment, 36 Motion for Trial filed by Leroy Folkes. Order signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 8/26/2010. (ncha, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.