Bell v. Cooke et al
| John James Bell |
| Doris Ann Cooke, M Beinor, P Hough, Cecilia Reynolds and Jennie McKay |
| 8:2010cv00398 |
| February 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Anderson/Greenwood Office |
| Kershaw |
| Henry F Floyd |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER ADOPTING 80 Report and Recommendations; GRANTING 68 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by P Hough, Jennie McKay, Cecilia Reynolds, Doris Ann Cooke, M Beinor as to Plaintiffs federal claims and those federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudi ce. To the extent that Plaintiff has brought any state claims in this action, however, those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice so that he can bring them in state court if he wishes to do so.Signed by Honorable Henry F Floyd on 11/2/2010. (mbro, )
|
|
Filing
80
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the Defendants' 68 MOTION for Summary Judgment be granted; Objections to R&R due by 11/4/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks on October 18, 2010. (Attachment: # 1 objection notice)(ncha, )
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER denying 37 Motion For Permission to Serve Interrogatories upon SCDC Employees and 36 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks on 4/26/2010.(ncha, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
