Weber v. Jones et al
| Mauricio E Weber |
| Sergeant Tribble, Lieutenant Looper, Arlette Jones, FNU Hankins, Corporal Santos, FNU Ham, FNU Collins, Officer Reeves, Rhonda Latimer, Garry L Bryant, Officer Ashe, Holden and Lieutenant Hayden |
| 8:2012cv03349 |
| November 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Anderson/Greenwood Office |
| Anderson |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| G Ross Anderson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr (Other) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER ruling on 58 Report and Recommendations. Defendants' 30 Motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The court dismisses the claims against Defendants in their official capacities, claims r egarding the conditions of confinement, the negligence claim against Defendant Santos, and the failure to protect claim against Defendant Ashe. Only Plaintiff's claims of excessive force and assault and battery against Defendant Santos in his individual capacity remain. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 3/26/14.(pbri, ) (Main Document 71 replaced on 3/26/2014: to correct typo). Modified on 3/26/2014: to correct docket text (kmca).
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER that Plaintiff's 57 objections to the magistrate judge's 54 order of December 18, 2013 are without merit. Accordingly, the 54 order is affirmed. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 3/18/14. (kmca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
