Anderson v. USAA Federal Savings Bank

Defendant: USAA Federal Savings Bank
Plaintiff: Helen Anderson
Case Number: 8:2013cv01316
Filed: May 15, 2013
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Anderson/Greenwood Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Timothy M Cain
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 4, 2013 17 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, and Plaintiffs SCUTPA claim is dismissed with prejudice. ; denying 8 Motion for Summary Judgment Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 9/4/2013.(gpre, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USAA Federal Savings Bank
Represented By: Giles M Schanen, Jr
Represented By: Dowse Bradwell Rustin, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Helen Anderson
Represented By: Thomas Whitfield Dunaway, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.