Allen v. McFadden

Petitioner: Michael Anthony Allen
Respondent: Joseph L McFadden
Case Number: 8:2014cv03661
Filed: September 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Anderson/Greenwood Office
County: Dorchester
Presiding Judge: Jacquelyn D Austin
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2015 Filing 47 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 37 Report and Recommendation and GRANTS 24 Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment. The habeas petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 9/28/2015. (gpre, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. McFadden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Joseph L McFadden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?