Vanzant v. Carolina Center for Occupational Health et al
| Ronnie J Vanzant |
| Carolina Center for Occupational Health, Berry Weisglass, CCOH Malpractice Insurance Company, Charleston, City of, Al Cannon, Charleston County Detention Center, Theodolph H Jacob, Ms Hoffman and Michelle Page |
| 8:2014cv03725 |
| September 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Anderson/Greenwood Office |
| Charleston |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopts 127 Report and Recommendation. Defendants 109 motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment is GRANTED and case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 2/23/2016. (gpre, )
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 95 Report and Recommendation. Motion to Dismiss 12 filed by the City and CCDC is GRANTED;Motion to Dismiss 20 filed by CCOH and the Insurance Company is GRANTED;Motion for Summary Judgment 60 filed by Dr. Weissglass is GRANTED; Motion for Summary Judgment 65 filed by Sheriff Cannon is GRANTED; Motion to Dismiss 32 filed by Huffman, Page, and Dr. Jacobs is DENIED; Motion for Summary Judgment 26 filed by Plaintiff is DENIED. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 8/25/2015. (gpre, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
