Pleasurecraft Marine Engine Co v. Indmar Products Co Inc
Plaintiff: Pleasurecraft Marine Engine Co
Defendant: Indmar Products Co Inc
Case Number: 8:2014cv04507
Filed: November 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Anderson/Greenwood Office
County: Greenwood
Presiding Judge: Mary G Lewis
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER granting 31 Motion to Stay. This action is stayed pending action by the USPTO/PTAB on the IPR Petition and subsequent reexamination, if ordered, of the patent in suit. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 9/15/2015.(abuc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pleasurecraft Marine Engine Co v. Indmar Products Co Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pleasurecraft Marine Engine Co
Represented By: Steve Allen Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Indmar Products Co Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?