Porter v. Thomas

Porter v. Thomas

Petitioner:	Gerald Porter
Respondent:	L R Thomas
Case Number:	8:2015cv03584
Filed:	September 4, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Anderson/Greenwood Office
County:	Edgefield
Presiding Judge:	Mary Geiger Lewis
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 7, 2017	Filing 46 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopts 43 Report and Recommendation. Petition is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 8/7/2017. (gpre, )
June 23, 2017	Filing 41 ORDER re 34 MOTION to dismiss. Petitioner has failed to respond to the motion to dismiss, it appears to the Court that he wishes to abandon this action. It is ORDERED that Petitioner shall have through July 13, 2017, to file his response to the motion to dismiss. Petitioner is advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be subject to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), and for failure to comply with this Courts orders, pursuan t to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 6/23/2017. (abuc)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 7, 2017

Filing 46 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopts 43 Report and Recommendation. Petition is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 8/7/2017. (gpre, )

June 23, 2017

Filing 41 ORDER re 34 MOTION to dismiss. Petitioner has failed to respond to the motion to dismiss, it appears to the Court that he wishes to abandon this action. It is ORDERED that Petitioner shall have through July 13, 2017, to file his response to the motion to dismiss. Petitioner is advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be subject to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), and for failure to comply with this Courts orders, pursuan t to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 6/23/2017. (abuc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Porter v. Thomas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Gerald Porter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: L R Thomas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?