Greene v. Warden FCI Edgefield

Petitioner: Deshawn Greene
Respondent: Warden FCI Edgefield
Case Number: 8:2016cv01803
Filed: June 2, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Anderson/Greenwood Office
County: Edgefield
Presiding Judge: R Bryan Harwell
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2017 Filing 33 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopts 30 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Respondent's 21 motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment and DENIES AND DISMISSES Petitioner's § 2241 petition with prejudice. The Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 4/24/2017. (gpre, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Greene v. Warden FCI Edgefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Deshawn Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden FCI Edgefield
Represented By: Marshall Prince
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?