Sarratt v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
| Michael Anthony Sarratt |
| South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P Stirling and Sandra R Barrett |
| 8:2016cv03486 |
| October 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Anderson/Greenwood Office |
| Lexington |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
149
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopts 145 Report and Recommendation, 134 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 8/2/2019. (gpre, )
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopts 133 Report and Recommendation. 123 Motion for Emergency Pretrial Injunctive Relief is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 4/11/2019. (gpre, )
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, The claims against Barrett in her official capacity are DISMISSED as moot. The Motion for Summary Judgment 90 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part with leave to refile. The Motion is granted as to Plaintiff's claim against all Defendants that she is being denied medical treatment in violation of the Eighth Amendment, granted as to all claims against the South Carolina Department of Corrections, granted as to all claims ag ainst Stirling and Barrett in their individual capacities, and denied with leave to refile as to all other claims for injunctive relief against Stirling in his official capacity. Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time 114 is DISMISSED as moot. In the event that Defendant Stirling intends to refile his Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to the remaining claims, he is directed to do so within 45 days. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 2/6/2019. (gpre, )
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopts 57 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court DENIES with leave to refile Plaintiffs first 21 motion for preliminary injunction and motion to amend the first 27 motion for preliminary injunction. The Court FINDS AS MOOT Plaintiffs second 54 motion for preliminary injunction. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 9/11/2017. (gpre, )
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER: Defendants must file any dispositive motions within ten (10) days of the filing date of this Order. If no dispositive motions are filed within the 10-day period, the Court will infer that Defendant wishes to proceed to trial. Motions due by 6/29/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 6/19/2017. (abuc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
