Rainsford v. Apex Bank
Bettis C Rainsford |
Apex Bank |
8:2016cv03521 |
October 28, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Anderson/Greenwood Office |
Abbeville |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
Henry M Herlong |
Appeal |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER - Bankruptcy Appeal re 1 Bankruptcy Appeal filed by Bettis C Rainsford. It is the judgment of this Court the decision of the Bankruptcy Court is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 8/3/2017. (abuc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rainsford v. Apex Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellant: Bettis C Rainsford | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellee: Apex Bank | |
Represented By: | George Barry Cauthen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.