Rainsford v. Apex Bank
Appellant: Bettis C Rainsford
Appellee: Apex Bank
Case Number: 8:2016cv03521
Filed: October 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Anderson/Greenwood Office
County: Abbeville
Presiding Judge: Jacquelyn D Austin
Presiding Judge: Henry M Herlong
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER - Bankruptcy Appeal re 1 Bankruptcy Appeal filed by Bettis C Rainsford. It is the judgment of this Court the decision of the Bankruptcy Court is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 8/3/2017. (abuc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rainsford v. Apex Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Bettis C Rainsford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Apex Bank
Represented By: George Barry Cauthen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?