Quicken Loans Inc v. Trizzino

Plaintiff: Quicken Loans Inc
Defendant: Joseph Trizzino
Case Number: 8:2017cv02154
Filed: August 15, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Anderson/Greenwood Office
County: Oconee
Presiding Judge: Mary Geiger Lewis
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1345
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 DEFAULT JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that Quicken Loans, Inc. recover from the defendant, Joseph Trizzino, in the amount of Ninety-Six Thousand, Seven Hundred and Forty-Nine dollars, and ($96,749.69), plus interest in the amount of 3.375% from December 27, 2017 through date of entry of this judgment. (abuc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Quicken Loans Inc v. Trizzino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quicken Loans Inc
Represented By: Sean Matthew Foerster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Trizzino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?