Wright v. Bragg et al
| David Wright, Sr |
| M Travis Bragg, R Harsany, John Doe, Mary Doe and Robert Doe |
| 8:2017cv02805 |
| October 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Anderson/Greenwood Office |
| Marlboro |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
187
ORDER RULING ON 179 Adopting Report and Recommendation. The motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment 141 is GRANTED. filed by Luis Negron, Dr. DeCoco. Signed by Honorable Donald C. Coggins, Jr. on 1/27/2021. (sgri)
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 152 The Court adopts the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Defendant Smith's Motion to Dismiss 115 is GRANTED and Defendants' Hansen, Berrios, and Onuoha's Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment 117 is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 9/23/20. (rweb, )
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopts 81 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's FTCA claim is DISMISSED. The United States is dismissed as a Defendant from this action. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 1/17/2020. (gpre, )
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopts 57 Report and Recommendation. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 49 is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 6/19/2019. (gpre, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
