Goldson v. FBCS Inc et al
| Mikki Goldson |
| John Does, Cavalry SPV I LLC and FBCS Inc |
| 8:2018cv02128 |
| August 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Anderson/Greenwood Office |
| Anderson |
| Timothy M Cain |
| A Marvin Quattlebaum |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 9/11/18. (kmca)
|
| Filing 6 Case Reassigned to Judge Honorable Timothy M Cain. Judge Honorable A Marvin Quattlebaum, Jr no longer assigned to the case. (cwil, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Settlement as to All Parties by Mikki Goldson (Norsworthy, Kenneth) Modified on 9/7/2018 to edit text (alew, ). |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Cavalry SPV I LLC, FBCS Inc. (abuc) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Mikki Goldson.(abuc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cavalry SPV I LLC, John Does, FBCS Inc (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-7923415.), filed by Mikki Goldson. Service due by 10/31/2018 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Letter)(abuc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
