Roudabush v. Inch et al
James L Roudabush, Jr |
Bassel, Lt Young, Lt Blackwelder, Dr Ebberly, Lt Robertson, Correctional Officer Davis, Dr Kelly, Correctional Officer Jones, Mark Inch, V Murthy, Jr, Correctional Officer Forrest, Mailroom Sup FCI Williamsburg, Dr Anderson, Lt Collister, Correctional Officer Hunard, Dr Blocker, Warden B Mosely, US of America, Correctional Officer Liggins, Correctional Officer Taylor, Correctional Officer Hamer, Lt Johnson, B. Antonelli, Correctional Officer Hampton, Dr Bryan, Two Lts at FCI Edgefield, Correctional Officer Hackenberg and Dr Garber |
8:2018cv02314 |
August 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #21 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation, placed in U.S. Mail to James L Roudabush, Jr. (kric, ) |
|
Filing 17 MOTION to Amend/Correct names by James L Roudabush, Jr. Response to Motion due by 10/23/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(gpre, ) |
Filing 16 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION placed in U.S. Mail to James L Roudabush Jr. (gpre, ) |
Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommended that Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis #8 be DENIED. It is further recommended that Plaintiff be given twenty-one (21) days from the date the United States District Judge rules on this Report and Recommendation to pay the filing fee of four hundred dollars ($400) and that the Clerk of Court withhold entry of judgment until such time for payment expires. Objections to R&R due by 10/5/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 9/21/2018. (gpre, ) |
Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 12 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, Docket Sheet, #5 Order, summons form, USM-285 forms (29), placed in U.S. Mail to James L Roudabush Jr. (gpre, ) |
|
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to comply with proper form order; and request list naming all defendants by James L Roudabush, Jr. Response to Motion due by 10/2/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(gpre, ) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by James L Roudabush, Jr. Response to Motion due by 10/2/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(gpre, ) |
Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order with court's complaint form, AO240, financial certificate, summons with blank paper, 29 USM-285s, placed in U.S. Mail to James L Roudabush, Jr (kmca) |
|
Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: ANDERSON/GREENWOOD. (gpre, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by James L Roudabush, Jr. Service due by 11/19/2018 (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)(gpre, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/18/2018: #3 Complaint on court form, #4 Envelope) (gpre, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.