SSC Seneca Operating Company LLC v. Sims

Plaintiff: SSC Seneca Operating Company LLC
Defendant: Erline Sims
Case Number: 8:2018cv03073
Filed: November 13, 2018
Court: South Carolina District Court
Presiding Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed#Document Text
November 13, 2018 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by SSC Seneca Operating Company LLC.(alew, )
November 13, 2018 1 COMPLAINT against Erline Sims ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8104905.), filed by SSC Seneca Operating Company LLC. Service due by 2/11/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Arbitration Agreement, #2 Exhibit B-Notice of Intent)(alew, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SSC Seneca Operating Company LLC v. Sims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SSC Seneca Operating Company LLC
Represented By: Donald Jay Davis, Jr
Represented By: Perry McPherson Buckner, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Erline Sims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?