Shayne et al v. Lampl
Leslie Jay Shayne |
Sondra Lampl |
Charlotte Shayne |
8:2019cv00020 |
January 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
Kevin McDonald |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Leslie Jay Shayne.(kric, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sondra Lampl ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number SCX600008157.), filed by Leslie Jay Shayne. Service due by 4/3/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Comparison of Care, #2 Exhibit 2 Certification of Roshelle Diggs, #3 Exhibit 3 Visitor Report, #4 Exhibit 4 Certification of Dr Billy Campbell, #5 Exhibit 5 Probate Court Documents, #6 Exhibit 6 Certificate of Appointment, #7 Exhibit 7 Amended Registration of Guardianship, #8 Exhibit 8 Report of Gal for Charlotte Shayne, #9 Exhibit 9 Fiduciary Letters, #10 Exhibit 10 Final order appointing Leslie Jay Shayne, #11 Exhibit 11 Letter to Judge Innes, #12 Exhibit 12 Email from Sondra Lampl with medical statements, #13 Exhibit 13 order regarding Les Shayne remaining as Payee, #14 Exhibit 14 Brief in support of motion to appeal, #15 Exhibit 15 regarding Powers of Attorney best scan possible, #16 Exhibit 16 Certification of Kenneth E Johns Jr, #17 Exhibit 17 Order from motion to strike, #18 Exhibit 18 Order and rule to show cause hearing)(kric, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.