Henderson v. SAFECO Insurance Company of America et al
Michael Henderson |
SAFECO Insurance Company of America and Anderson, City of |
8:2019cv00906 |
March 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for Protective Order by SAFECO Insurance Company of America. Response to Motion due by 4/9/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(alew, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Sever by SAFECO Insurance Company of America. Response to Motion due by 4/9/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(alew, ) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to State Court Complaint by SAFECO Insurance Company of America.(alew, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by SAFECO Insurance Company of America.(alew, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Anderson County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2019-CP-04-00275. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8347942), filed by SAFECO Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Declarations Page, #2 State Court Documents)(alew, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.