Dickerson v. Stirling
Case Number: 8:2019cv01158
Filed: March 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Anderson/Greenwood Office
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ADOPTS AS MODIFIED the Magistrate Judge's R&R [ECF No. 46/27], DENIES Plaintiff's discovery-related motion [ECF No. 57/45], and GRANTS Defendant's motion for summary jud gment [ECF No. 39/27] as to Plaintiff's federal § 1983 claims. The Court hereby DECONSOLIDATES Civil Action No. 8:19-cv-01158-RBH from Civil Action No.8:19-cv-01316-RBH and DISMISSES Civil Action No. 8:19-cv-01316-RBH in its entirety with prejudice. As to Civil Action No. 8:19-cv-01158-RBH, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's federal claims with prejudice and REMANDS his state-law claims (the ones raised in the original/removed complaint in Civil Action No. 8:19-cv-01158-RBH, see ECF Nos. 1-1 & 26-4) to the Richland County Court of Common Pleas for further proceedings. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to mail a certified copy of this Order to the clerk of the Richland County Court of Common Pleas only as to Civil ActionNo. 8:19-cv-01158-RBH. Signed by Chief Judge R Bryan Harwell on 3/23/2020. (gpre, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dickerson v. Stirling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?