McCoy v. Budz et al
Roger Dale McCoy and Roger D McCoy |
Jared Anderson and Timothy Budz |
8:2019cv01421 |
May 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
Terry L Wooten |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 OBJECTION to #13 Report and Recommendation by Roger Dale McCoy. Reply to Objections due by 7/25/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmca) |
Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, #12 Order - 1983 - No Service placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Roger Dale McCoy Wellpath - Blueridge 4546 Broad River Road Columbia, SC 29210 (gpre, ) |
Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommended that the District Court dismiss the Complaint in this case with prejudice and without issuance and service of process, pursuant to Rule 41, or in the alternative, summarily dismiss this action with prejudice for failure to state a claim, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915.2. Objections to R&R due by 7/12/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 6/28/2019. (gpre, ) |
Filing 12 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 6/28/2019. (gpre, ) |
Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Proper Form Order with blank amended complaint form, 8 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #9 Order Regarding Amendment, placed in U.S. Mail to Roger Dale McCoy. (kmca) |
Filing 9 ORDER REGARDING AMENDMENT. Plaintiff is hereby granted twenty-one (21) days from the date this order is entered (plus three days for mail time) to file an amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint that corrects the deficiencies, this action will be recommended for summary dismissal, with prejudice. (Amended Complaint due by 6/19/2019.) ***Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 5/29/19. (kmca) |
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 5/29/19.(kmca) |
Filing 7 PROPER FORM ORDER granting Plaintiff's #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and directing Plaintiff to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Case to be brought into proper form by 6/19/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 5/29/19. (kmca) |
Filing 4 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Columbia. (abuc) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Roger Dale McCoy. Response to Motion due by 5/29/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(abuc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jared Anderson, Timothy Budz, filed by Roger Dale McCoy. Service due by 8/13/2019 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(abuc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.