Addision v. South Carolina Law Enforcement Division et al
| Jerome Addision and Jerome Addison |
| South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and Mark A Keel |
| 8:2019cv01847 |
| June 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #16 Judgment, #15 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Jerome Addison 243778 Lieber Correctional Institution Cell 208 PO Box 205 Ridgeville, SC 29472 (gpre, ) |
| Filing 16 JUDGMENT action dismissed without prejudice. (gpre, ) |
Filing 15
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopts #9 Report and Recommendation, and DISMISSES without prejudice this action. Further, Plaintiff's #12 motion for counsel is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Timothy M. Cain on 8/22/2019. (gpre, ) Modified on 8/23/2019 to edit text (gpre, ).
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jerome Addison. Response to Motion due by 8/8/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.(gpre, ) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/26/2019) (gpre, ). |
| Filing 11 OBJECTION to #9 Report and Recommendation by Jerome Addison. Reply to Objections due by 8/8/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(gpre, ) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/26/2019) (gpre, ). |
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Order - 1983 - No Service, 8 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Jerome Addison, #243778, Lieber Correctional Institution, Cell 208, PO Box 205, Ridgeville, SC 29472. (kmca) |
| Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the District Court dismiss this action without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 7/24/2019. ***Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 7/10/19. (kmca) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis per #7 Order. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 7/10/19.(kmca) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 7/10/19. (kmca)
|
| Filing 4 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Charleston. (gpre, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Jerome Addison. Response to Motion due by 7/12/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(gpre, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark A Keel, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, filed by Jerome Addison. Service due by 9/26/2019 (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(gpre, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
