Kuhl v. Bi-Lo LLC
| Charles Kuhl |
| Bi-Lo LLC |
| 8:2019cv03005 |
| October 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Henry M Herlong |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER; Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 3/4/2020, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 4/3/2020, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 5/5/2020, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 5/5/2020, Discovery due by 6/4/2020, Motion in Limine due by 8/18/2020, Motions due by 6/18/2020, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 7/31/2020, Pretrial Briefs due by 8/25/2020, Jury Selection Deadline 9/1/2020. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 12/3/19. (sfla) |
| Filing 14 MEDIATION ORDER; Mediation Due by 6/11/2020. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 12/3/19. (sfla) |
| Filing 11 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Bi-Lo LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Conference and Scheduling Order)(Tonnsen, Eric) |
| Filing 9 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Charles Kuhl.(Newlon, Jon) |
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER; Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 11/18/2019, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 12/2/2019, Rule 26 Report due by 12/2/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 1/13/2020, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 2/12/2020, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 3/13/2020, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 3/13/2020, Discovery due by 4/13/2020, Motion in Limine due by 6/17/2020, Motions due by 4/27/2020, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 6/1/2020, Pretrial Briefs due by 6/24/2020, Jury Selection Deadline 7/1/2020. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 10/28/19. (sfla)
|
| Filing 7 REPLY by Bi-Lo LLC to #6 Order,, Set Deadlines, . (Tonnsen, Eric) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER directing Bi-Lo LLC to inform the court of the citizenship of all of its members for the purpose of determining whether the requirements of federal subject matter jurisdiction are satisfied, within ten (10) days of the date of this order. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 10/24/19. (kmca)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Bi-Lo LLC. (sfla) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Bi-Lo LLC.(sfla) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Greenwood County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2019-CP-24-934. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8738294) filed by Bi-Lo LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Summons and Complaint)(sfla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kuhl v. Bi-Lo LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charles Kuhl | |
| Represented By: | Jon E Newlon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bi-Lo LLC | |
| Represented By: | Eric Richard Tonnsen |
| Represented By: | John Patrick Bradley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
