Powell v. Whidden et al
Plaintiff: Shane Powell
Defendant: Ivan Louis Whidden and Celadon Trucking Services Inc
Case Number: 8:2019cv03322
Filed: November 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Donald C Coggins
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2019 Filing 10 SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY Upon the Record as to Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. by Celadon Trucking Services Inc. (Crane, Marshall)
December 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER AND NOTICE SETTING PRETRIAL TELEPHONE CONFERENCE for 1/30/2020 11:00 AM before Honorable Donald C Coggins Jr. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to arrange and initiate the conference call, conference in all other participating counsel, and then connect to chambers at 864-591-5340. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 12/11/2019. (abuc)
December 11, 2019 Filing 8 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 12/31/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 2/24/2020, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 3/20/2020, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 4/20/2020, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 5/11/2020, Discovery due by 6/8/2020, Motion in Limine due by 8/7/2020, Motions due by 6/22/2020, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 8/17/2020, Jury Selection Deadline 9/8/2020, Mediation Due by 7/6/2020, Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 12/11/2019. (abuc) (Main Document 8 replaced on 12/12/2019) (abuc, ).
December 10, 2019 Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Shane Powell.(Wooten, Raymond)
November 26, 2019 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff is directed to file their Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories no later than 12/10/19. (alew, )
November 26, 2019 Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Celadon Trucking Services Inc, Ivan Louis Whidden.(alew, )
November 26, 2019 Filing 3 ANSWER to State Court Complaint by Celadon Trucking Services Inc, Ivan Louis Whidden.(alew, )
November 26, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Oconee County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2019-CP-37-00682. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8797498), filed by Celadon Trucking Services Inc, Ivan Louis Whidden. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(alew, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Powell v. Whidden et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ivan Louis Whidden
Represented By: Marshall Collin Crane
Represented By: Mark Steven Barrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Celadon Trucking Services Inc
Represented By: Marshall Collin Crane
Represented By: Mark Steven Barrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shane Powell
Represented By: Raymond T Wooten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?